Handout: What are Departmental Select Committees?
by
18th August 2015
What are Departmental Select Committees?
How effectively do they perform their role of scrutinising the Executive? (10 marks)
What are Departmental Select Committees?
Do not confuse them with non-departmental Select Committees eg: the Public Accounts Committee or with Legislative/general Committees (formerly known as standing committees) which scrutinise/make amendments to Govt. legislation
- There are 19 Departmental Select Committees each one being concerned with a specific area of Govt. responsibility eg: Business innovation and skills; Children Schools and Families; Defence; Culture Media and Arts; Energy and Climate Change; Health; Transport etc
- They were introduced in 1979 in an attempt by Parliament to reassert control over the Executive
- They examine the expenditure administration and policy of the individual Govt. departments and then they report back to the House of Commons
- They deliberate in public and can provide expert knowledge on a particular subject
- Most meet once a week for approx. 2 hours
- DSCs usually have between 11 – 14 members and they are elected by all of the members of the House of Commons (unlike legislative Committees – no Govt. ministers/front bench opposition members are allowed and whips do not attend)
- The Chair of the DSC is usually someone with great influence – he/she receives a salary for this role
- The Govt. party has a majority on DSCs (membership = same proportion as seats in HoC) – BUT members are expected to behave in an non-partisan/neutral fashion
- Reports of the DSCs are, if possible, supported unanimously and carry great weight – there is often great publicity e.g.: recent report of the Public Accounts Committee on the government’s handling of the ‘bonfire of the quangos’
- DSCs have considerable powers – they can call for ministers, civil servants and external witnesses/official papers in their investigations
Their role is to:
- Investigate the work of govt. departments to determine whether they have acted efficiently/effectively
- Consider major departmental policies and determine whether they are well considered and have taken account of public opinion
- Consider proposed legislation – not with a view to blocking it, but to consider whether it is likely to be effective
- Consider matters of major public concern that fall within the remit of the Committee
- Investigate any serious errors or omissions made by the department
- Occasionally, to propose future legislation
- The DSCs have an adversarial style and can be quite aggressive – ‘witnesses; have no notification of the questions they will be asked
- DSCs have a small number of support staff assigned to them to undertake research/admin (DSCs do NOT exist in the HofL)
How effectively do they perform their role?
- They are probably the most effective way of calling the Govt. to account
- Can call expert witnesses/ministers etc
- They deliberate in public – transparent scrutiny
- Now that selection of membership = by ballot (since March 2010) – there is less opportunity for Whips to have influence = the DSCs are therefore more independent
- They do speak up against the Govt. eg: the Health Select Committee recently criticised the Govt.s proposals for NHS reform
- They aim to work together and to produce reports that are unanimous
- The Liaison Committee (made up of heads of all DSCs) can question the PM twice a year
HOWEVER
- They lack any real power and vary in quality – have been called the dog that never bites
- The convention of Collective Responsibility means it is difficult to really examine how policy decisions were made initially
- They can call ministers to give evidence – but cannot force them to do so
- They cannot discuss current legislation
- Civil Servants can withhold information if it is not ‘in the interests of national security’ to release it
- It is quite common for ministers to ignore Select Committee reports
- It would be better if their powers were strengthened eg: give them quasi-judicial powers to demand to see papers, and enforce witnesses to swear an oath of truth – also give them more time and better resources
0 Comments