Essay Plan: How to write a part (c) answer

by
2nd September 2015
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

How to write a part (c) answer

Why are some pressure groups more influential than others?

Content

The relationship of a pressure group to government is likely to make a significant difference, and insider groups can be at a great advantage in that respect.  This is not constant, and may change over time.

A large membership can be important, since decision making might be influence if Government feels it cannot ignore the views of a large section of the country.  A large size does not ensure power, however.  The unions remained large in the 1990s, but exerted little power.

Richer pressure groups can afford to fund their causes more effectively.  They may also be able to employ experts in public relations, marketing and communication, which may also enhance their power and success.  This ability to control economic resources may give pressure groups decisive influence, accounting for the power of business interests, particularly in a globalised economy.

Pressure groups in tune with the mood of the people are likely to hold sway over policy, particularly after dramatic events.  The Snowdrop appeal after the massacre of Dunblane proved to be influential in influencing public opinion and governmental policy.

The ability to cause major disruption is also an important factor, as seen by the actions of the lorry drivers in their protest over fuel prices in the autumn of 2000.

Groups going with the national grain (e.g./ the RSPCA) are more likely to succeed than others (animal liberation).

Pressure groups that cannot exert this sort of power are unlikely to have much influence.

Level Three (21- 30 marks)

A comprehensive demonstration of knowledge of political concepts, processes and institutions, and some of the relationships between them.  Excellent conceptual awareness with full examples.  Analysis displays a sophisticated awareness of differing viewpoints and clear and full evaluation of the issues.  Some use of political vocabulary with an excellent standard of written communication.

At least three factors, with appropriate examples.

Level Two (11-20 marks)

A sound demonstration of knowledge of political concepts, processes and institutions, and some of the relationships between them.  Reliable conceptual awareness with appropriate examples.  Analysis displays an awareness of differing viewpoints and good attempts at evaluation.  A reasonable level of written communication with some use of political vocabulary.

At least two factors.

Level One (0-10 marks)

A limited demonstration of knowledge of political concepts, processes and institutions and some of the relationships between them.  Superficial conceptual awareness, with limited examples.  Limited analysis with some awareness of differing viewpoints and basic attempts at evaluation.  Conclusions may have limited relevance to the preceding discussion.  A basic level of written communication with occasional use of political vocabulary.

One reason or will be very limited.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.