Test: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Quiz (Questions)

by
30th August 2015
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 1 of 36
Which idea is illustrated by the Supreme Court cases Schenck v. United States and Korematsu v . United States?

  1. The free speech rights of Communists have often been violated.
  2. During wartime, limitations on civil rights have been upheld by judicial action.
  3. The rights of protestors have been preserved even in times of national stress.
  4. Economic interests of foreign nations are frequently upheld in United States courts.

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 2 of 36
The Dred Scott decision on the issue of slavery upheld the Southern viewpoint that

  1. the power of the Supreme Court does not extend to cases of race
  2. Congress could not pass a law depriving territorial residents of their property
  3. a national vote should be held to decide the legality of slavery
  4. the economic well-being of the western states depended on slave labor

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 3 of 36
The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Escobedo v. Illinois all advanced the

  1. voting rights of minorities
  2. guarantees of free speech and press
  3. principle of separation of church and state
  4. rights of accused persons

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 4 of 36
An immediate result of the Supreme Court decision in Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935) and United States v. Butler (1936) was that

  1. some aspects of the New Deal were declared unconstitutional
  2. State governments took over relief agencies
  3. ) Congress was forced to abandon efforts to improve the economy
  4. the constitutional authority of the President was greatly expanded

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 5 of 36
Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Supreme Court was considered “activist” because of its

  1. reluctance to overturn state laws
  2. insistence on restricting freedom of speech to spoken words
  3. expansion of individual rights in criminal cases
  4. refusal to reconsider the issues of the Plessy v. Ferguson case

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 6 of 36
The “clear and present danger” ruling of the Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States illustrates the continuing conflict between

  1. free speech and governmental authority
  2. the use of search warrants and the rights of the accused
  3. state powers and Federal powers
  4. religious freedom and separation of church and state

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 7 of 36
“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.” -Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes ”Which interpretation of the Bill of Rights does this statement illustrate?

  1. The needs of the government are more important than civil liberties.
  2. Constitutional protections of liberty are not absolute.
  3. The Supreme Court can eliminate freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights.
  4. The Bill of Rights does not safeguard individual liberties.

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 8 of 36
Which generalization is consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States?

  1. The freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are virtually unlimited
  2. Government has the right to suspend any rights at any time.
  3. Individual rights can be limited in the national interest
  4. The balance between individual rights and the general social welfare almost always favors individual rights.

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 9 of 36
The significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison is that the decision

  1. advanced civil rights for minorities
  2. upheld the constitutionality of a national bank
  3. limited Presidential control of foreign policy
  4. established the power of judicial review

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 10 of 36
“Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Brown v. Board of Education

The effect of this Supreme Court ruling was to

  1. establish affirmative action programs in higher education
  2. require the integration of public schools
  3. desegregate the armed forces and the military academies
  4. force states to spend an equal amount on each public school student

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 11 of 36
The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the power of the

  1. House of Representatives to impeach the president
  2. Congress to override a presidential veto
  3. president to veto congressional legislation
  4. Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of laws

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 12 of 36
What was the result of many of the Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice John Marshall between 1801 and 1835?

  1. The system of slavery was weakened.
  2. The federal government was strengthened.
  3. The rights of workers were supported.
  4. Antitrust laws were upheld.  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 13 of 36
Supreme Court decisions in Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona affected individual liberties by

  1. eliminating the poll tax as a voting requirement
  2. preventing the use of organized prayer in public schools
  3. requiring equal pay for men and women performing the same job
  4. expanding the constitutional rights of people accused of crimes  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 14 of 36
As a result of the Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), a person accused of a crime is entitled to

  1. a speedy trial
  2. reasonable bail
  3. a reading of his or her rights at the time of arrest
  4. protection against cruel or unusual punishment  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 15 of 36
The Supreme Court decisions in Mapp v. Ohio, Gideon v. Wainright, and Miranda v. Arizona all expanded

  1. integration of public facilities
  2. rights of the accused
  3. presidential powers
  4. equality in the workplace  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 16 of 36
The police enter an individual’s home without invitation or a warrant and seize evidence to be used against the individual. Which Supreme Court decision may be used to rule this evidence inadmissible in court?

  1. Baker v. Carr
  2. Gideon v. Wainwright
  3. Mapp v. Ohio
  4. Roe v. Wade

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 17 of 36
The Supreme Court decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) have been criticized because these rulings

  1. expanded the rights of the accused
  2. granted more powers to federal judges
  3. lengthened prison sentences for the guilty
  4. reinstated the use of capital punishment  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 18 of 36
The case of John Peter Zenger (1735) and New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) both involved a government’s attempt to limit

  1. freedom of religion
  2. freedom of the press
  3. the right to bear arms
  4. the right to counsel  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 19 of 36
The Supreme Court cases of Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. TLO involved the issue of

  1. freedom of the press
  2. the rights of students in school
  3. freedom of religion
  4. the rights of prison inmates

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 20 of 36
The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Tinker v. Des Moines and New York Times Co. v. United States were based on interpretations of the

  1. meaning of a republican form of government
  2. powers delegated specifically to Congress
  3. president’s right to executive privilege
  4. rights guaranteed by the 1st amendment  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 21 of 36
The Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) was based on the constitutional principle of

  1. protection of property rights
  2. freedom of speech
  3. right to privacy
  4. freedom of religion

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 22 of 36
The Supreme Court decisions in New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) and United States v. Nixon (1974) reinforced the principle that the president of the United States

  1. has unlimited use of the veto power
  2. is protected from unfair media criticism
  3. may not be convicted of a crime
  4. is not above the law  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 23 of 36
 

 

 “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Which constitutional idea was the basis for this Supreme Court decision?

 

 

  1. protection against double jeopardy
  2. equal protection of the law
  3. freedom of speech
  4. right of assembly  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 24 of 36
In the 1960s, Supreme Court decisions in the cases Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright specifically protected the rights of

  1. the accused
  2. women
  3. military veterans
  4. persons with disabilities  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 25 of 36
The Jim Crow legal system, which expanded in the South after Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), was based on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the

  1. due process clause of the 5th Amendment
  2. states’ rights provision of the 10th Amendment
  3. equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment
  4. voting rights provision in the 15th Amendment  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 26 of 36
 

 

“We conclude that in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. . . .”

— Chief Justice Earl Warren, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka

 

This quotation illustrates the Supreme Court’s power to

 

  1. uphold previous decisions
  2. overrule state laws
  3. check the powers of the executive branch
  4. provide for educational funding  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 27 of 36
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court ruled that

  1. states may not secede from the Union
  2. racial segregation was constitutional
  3. slaves are property and may not be taken from their owners
  4. all western territories should be open to slavery  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 28 of 36
Which headline illustrates the use of judicial review?

  1. “Congress Passes a Civil Rights Bill”
  2. “Conference Committee Meets to Finalize Budget”
  3. “New York State’s Reapportionment Plan Ruled Unconstitutional”
  4. “President Signs SALT Agreement with Russia”  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 29 of 36
The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v. United States (1919) stated that

  1. immigrants have limited rights
  2. freedom of speech is not absolute
  3. rights of the accused may not be limited
  4. women should be granted suffrage  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 30 of 36
The cartoonist is commenting on public reaction to the Supreme Court decision that

  1. restricted attendance in churches
  2. mandated home-based prayer
  3. declared school-sponsored prayer unconstitutional
  4. banned public observance of religious holidays  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 31 of 36
In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that persons convicted of crimes had been

  1. denied due process of law
  2. denied a speedy and public trial
  3. victimized by illegal search and seizure
  4. sentenced to cruel and unusual punishment  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 32 of 36
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision

  1. denied Congress the power to regulate slavery in the territories
  2. allowed for the importation of enslaved persons for ten years
  3. prohibited slavery in lands west of the Mississippi River
  4. gave full citizenship to all enslaved persons

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 33 of 36
The Supreme Court cases of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) dealt with the constitutional principle of

  1. freedom of religion
  2. freedom from unreasonable search
  3. separation of powers
  4. rights of the accused

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 34 of 36
Many of the decisions made by the Supreme Court while John Marshall was Chief Justice led directly to

  1. a reduction of federal influence in economic affairs
  2. an increase in the power of the federal government over the states
  3. a greater role for Congress in foreign policy
  4. a limitation on slavery in the states  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 35 of 36
In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court decided that a “clear and present danger” to the country allowed the federal government to

  1. establish a peacetime draft
  2. restrict first amendment rights
  3. suspend habeas corpus
  4. limit minority voting rights  

 

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Question 36 of 36
One similarity between the laws being challenged in the United States Supreme Court cases of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Korematsu v. United States (1944) is that

  1. specific groups of people were being targeted based on race or ethnicity
  2. state laws were declared unconstitutional
  3. immigrants were relocated to prison camps
  4. federal laws segregating public transportation were upheld  

 

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.