Handout 1: How Are Supreme Court Justices Appointed?
by
16th August 2015
How are Supreme Court Justices appointed?
1. Vacancy occurs
2. President nominates
3. Senate Judicial Committee approves (50% + 1 required for approval)
Recent Successful Appointments
Elena Kagan (Barack Obama) 2010
- previously White House Council and Solicitor General but no previous experience as a judge
- nomination endorsed by the deans of over a third of the nations law schools
- nomination and questioning uneventful
- described as an ‘Obama person’ i.e. moderate and favouring consensus
- approved by vote of 63-37
Sonia Sotomayor (Barack Obama) 2009
- first Hispanic judge to sit on Supreme Court bench
- questioned about comments that a Latina women would make a better decision than a white male in earlier speeches (Newt Gingrich branded her a racist)
- 3rd woman to sit on bench
- approved by vote of 68-31
“Close Call” Senate Approvals
Clarence Thomas (George H W Bush) 1990
- race based appointment?
- had never written a legal book, article, or brief of consequence, and had been a judge for only a year
- NAACP, and NOW opposed nomination because of his opposition to affirmative action and Roe v. Wade
- sexual harassment allegations from former colleague
- approved by vote of 52-48
Senate Rejection of Nominees
Robert Bork (Ronald Reagan) 1987
- very right wing, nominated to replace a moderate
- wanted to roll back civil rights decisions made by previous courts
- nomination opposed by civil rights groups including ACLU
- TV ads attacked him as extremist
- indicated he may have wanted to reverse Roe v. Wade
- rejected by vote of 42-58
Clement Haynsworth (Richard Nixon) 1969
- right wing, nominated to replace liberal
- opposed by Democrats, liberal Republicans and NAACP
- allegedly favoured segregation and anti-labor
- rejected by vote of 55-45
G Harold Carswell (Richard Nixon) 1970
- nominated after Haynsworth nomination rejected
- questionable record on civil rights, women’s rights and favoured segregation
- painted as Southern right wing extremist, strict constructionist
- rejected by vote of 51-45
0 Comments